- The Money Maniac
- Posts
- š° 5 Fact Friday: When Politics Skew The Data
š° 5 Fact Friday: When Politics Skew The Data
Consumer confidence is tanking, but not for the reason you think. A quiet shift in who gets surveyed means one political group is shaping the entire headline.
Good morning, Maniacs!
To celebrate the end of the longest government shutdown in U.S. history⦠stocks had their worst day in a month. Ten of eleven sectors closed in the red as the market digested days of uncertainty.
Fed speakers also poured a bit of cold water on expectations for a December rate cut. Odds of a cut have plunged from 96% one month ago to just 50% today. With that shift, some of the marketās recent momentum cooled, and even Bitcoin slipped back below $100K.
Earnings played a smaller role this week, with only a handful of major companies reporting. The AI trend held steady, with AMD and Cisco both beating expectations. Disney, on the other hand, underperformed and fell nearly 8 percent.
Given the lighter week on the corporate front, todayās issue zooms in on major policy proposals and economic data (or lack thereof).
Letās dive in! š
OUR PARTNER: RAD INTEL
The AI Race Just Went Nuclear ā Own the Rails.
Meta, Google, and Microsoft just reported record profits ā and record AI infrastructure spending:
Meta boosted its AI budget to as much as $72 billion this year.
Google raised its estimate to $93 billion for 2025.
Microsoft is following suit, investing heavily in AI data centers and decision layers.
While Wall Street reacts, the message is clear: AI infrastructure is the next trillion-dollar frontier.
RAD Intel already builds that infrastructure ā the AI decision layer powering marketing performance for Fortune 1000 brands. Backed by Adobe, Fidelity Ventures, and insiders from Google, Meta, and Amazon, the company has raised $50M+, grown valuation 4,900%, and doubled sales contracts in 2025 with seven-figure contracts secured.
Shares remain $0.81 until Nov 20, then the price changes.
š Invest in RAD Intel before the next share-price move.
This is a paid advertisement for RAD Intel made pursuant to Regulation A+ offering and involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. The valuation is set by the Company and there is currently no public market for the Company's Common Stock. Nasdaq ticker āRADIā has been reserved by RAD Intel and any potential listing is subject to future regulatory approval and market conditions. Investor references reflect factual individual or institutional participation and do not imply endorsement or sponsorship by the referenced companies. Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.radintel.ai.
REAL ESTATE
1. 50-Year Mortgages Wonāt Fix The Housing Crisis šļø
The housing market is broken. Prices are up 56% since 2020. Monthly payments have surged 80% in five years. And the average cost of owning is now 40% higher than renting. So whatās the fix?
Bill Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, says: Just stretch the loan to 50 years.
In theory, it sounds simple. Spread payments across a longer timeline, lower monthly costs, and help more buyers get into homes.
Does it make homes more āaffordableā?
Kind of. A $400,000 loan at 6.3% over 30 years costs $2,480 per month. Stretch it to 50 years, and the payment drops to $2,200 ā a $280 monthly savings.
But over time, the borrower would pay $425,000 in extra interest. And that assumes the exact same interest rate, which is not realistic.
Longer loans = higher rates
At present, 30-year rates are about 0.7% higher than 15-year ones. So it is safe to assume that 50-year mortgages would demand even higher rates.
Just a 0.5% increase over the 30-year rate would eliminate more than half of the potential savings of a 50-year mortgage.
Equity builds painfully slowly.
With a 6.3% mortgage rate, a 30-year borrower will have paid off nearly 18% of the principal after 10 years.
If we assume a 6.8% mortgage rate, a 50-year borrower will have paid off less than 4% of the principal in 10 years.
That difference matters if you want to refinance, sell, or avoid being underwater during a downturn.
This reduction in home equity also increases the overall risk in the mortgage system. It is one of the reasons regulators capped mortgages at 30 years after the 2008 financial crisis.
You probably wonāt invest the difference.
Sure, you could extend your mortgage and invest the savings. If history is any guide, it would likely be a profitable trade.
But if youāre opting for a 50-year mortgage today, odds are youāre just struggling to get in the door ā not trying to beat the market with borrowed money.
Hereās the kicker: it fuels demand.
Zillow estimates the U.S. is short 4.5 million homes, and experts believe it could take a decade or more to close the gap.
A 50-year mortgage might help more buyers qualify, but it doesnāt build a single new home. More demand without more supply? That just pushes prices higher.
So while a 50-year loan might look like a lifeline, itās really just a demand booster in a market starving for supply.
After the lukewarm reception, Bill Pulte appears to have already moved on. His next pitch? Portable mortgages.
The details still need to be worked out, but this idea at least aims to fix the right problem. Letting homeowners bring their current mortgage rate to a new property could break the lock-in effect and enable millions of buyers to move.
If it cut your payment by $300 per month, would you take a 50-year mortgage? (Even if it meant paying nearly double in interest.) |
MARKETS
2. Hiring Slows, Layoffs Rise, Wages Cool š¦
No jobs report? No problem... sort of.
Thanks to the government shutdown, the October labor report may never arrive ā in a twist that caught even Wall Street off guard.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the shutdown made it āextraordinarily difficultā for government economists to collect and process the data necessary for the October CPI and jobs reports.
So what do we have instead? A patchwork of private data sources.
Truflation pulls from over a dozen public and commercial sources to generate a real-time measure of the total employment picture.
Other providers offer narrower views into specific trends, such as payroll activity, job postings, hiring announcements, and resume changes.
Hereās what the alternative data is telling us:
Hiring is slowing.
ADP: just 42K private sector jobs added in October.
LinkUp: net job losses last month.
Indeed: job postings are at their lowest since 2021.
Even holiday hiring plans are tracking below pre-pandemic norms.
Workers are staying put.
Revelio: Attrition rates continue to fall.
Layoffs may be rising.
October saw 153K announced job cuts, the highest Q4 tally since 2008.
The Chicago Fed estimates unemployment hit 4.4%, a 4-year high.
Wages are cooling.
Indeed and ADP both show softening wage growth across the board.
The official numbers may be missing, but the signals are clear.
Hiring is slowing, layoffs are picking up, and wage growth is cooling. For now, alternative data is filling the gap, and itās painting a picture of a labor market under stress.
OUR PARTNER: ROKU
CTV ads made easy: Black Friday edition
As with any digital ad campaign, the important thing is to reach streaming audiences who will convert. Rokuās self-service Ads Manager stands ready with powerful segmentation and targeting ā plus creative upscaling tools that transform existing assets into CTV-ready video ads. Bonus: weāre gifting you $5K in ad credits when you spend your first $5K on Roku Ads Manager. Just sign up and use code GET5K. Terms apply.
ECONOMY
3. Sampling Bias Is Warping The Data š¤
Speaking of data... availability is not all that matters. Quality matters too. In other words, data is only useful if it actually reflects reality.
The University of Michiganās latest consumer survey showed sentiment hitting a 3.5-year low.
Not exactly a shocker when you consider whatās been going on: a historic government shutdown, grounded flights, disrupted SNAP benefits, and furloughed workers.
The vibes? Understandably bad.
But Fundstratās Tom Lee says there is more to the story, and maybe the data itself is part of the problem.
For years, the University of Michigan targeted a roughly 50/50 split of Republican and Democratic respondents to produce a representative sample. But that mix has quietly changed since early 2024.
As you can see in this article, the latest survey is composed of 65% Democrats and 35% Republicans.
Since political affiliation now heavily shapes economic expectations, that imbalance produces skewed sentiment readings and potentially misleading signals for markets.
Here is one example Lee points to: one year from now, Democrats expect inflation to rise to 5.3%, while Republicans expect it to fall to 1.5%.
This illustrates the broader issue.
If investors rely on flawed survey data, they risk reacting to noise instead of signals. And if sentiment no longer tracks the real economy, itās not worth much.
Personally, I have been discounting survey-based data in favor of āhard dataā for some time (even though that too has limitations). This latest shift in survey composition is simply one more reason to do so.
PERSONAL FINANCE
4. Why $2K Checks Are A Long Shot š¤
With tariffs under review in the Supreme Court, Trump recently floated the idea of sending Americans a $2,000 ātariff dividend.ā
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent initially hinted this could come in the form of a tax cut. But in recent interviews, he confirmed that actual cash payments are on the table for families making under $100,000.
But donāt start mentally spending that windfall just yet.
Déjà vu?
Stimulus checks fueled a post-COVID spending boom⦠and contributed to a multi-year inflation problem. While the inflation rate has cooled, prices never reversed. A new round of payments could easily reignite the fire.
Math is hard.
The Treasury is on pace to collect $400 billion in tariff revenue per year, a record high. But that is still short of the $450 to $600 billion needed to fund $2K checks for most households.
To make this work, the government would need higher tariffs, fewer recipients, or more debt. Ugh.
Lower earners could benefit.
Tariffs are a regressive tax (they hit low-income consumers hardest). So refunding the money to that group could help balance that out.
But for middle- and high-income households? Theyād foot the bill with no refund.
Weāve heard this before.
Trump previously teased a āDoge dividendā that never materialized. This latest proposal may be more about building support for tariffs than a firm policy plan.
So whatās the real chance?
Hereās what prediction markets say:
Kalshi: 4% chance of a $1,000 dividend this year
Polymarket: 7% chance of a $2,000 dividend this year
Polymarket: 28% chance of a $2,000 dividend by Q1 2026
So donāt spend that bonus check just yet. It may be a long wait ā if it comes at all.
TRIVIA
5. Which iPhone 17 Color Is the Fan Favorite? šØ
For the first time since 2013, the new iPhone lineup skips a black or near-black option. Instead, the 17 Pro and Pro Max come in three bold new colors.
Which one do you think is the most popular so far?
Take your guess:
āŖ Silver
šµ Deep Blue
š Cosmic Orange
Thanks For Reading!
How was today's email? |
Spread The Wealth šø
Like what you read? Do me a favor and donāt keep it a secret! Send this newsletter to a friend and help them level up their financial gameāone fact at a time.
Click the button above -or- copy and paste this link: https://read.themoneymaniac.com/subscribe?ref=PLACEHOLDER
DISCLAIMER: The information provided in this newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice or a solicitation to buy or sell any assets. All opinions expressed are those of the author and are subject to change without notice. Please do your own research or consult with a licensed professional before making any investment decisions.





Reply